This report derives from the presented line diagram delineating the proportion of retail opened and closed in a country from 2011 to 2018.
Generally speaking, the number of closing was always above than opening except in 2011 and 2015. Both figures fluctuated wildly in the seven years time.
A glance at the graph reveals that the shutdown figure reached a peak of 6300 despite fluctuation in the first four years. By contrast, the opening trend declined significantly to 4000 before exhibiting a considerable surge to its highest point with about 6300. Although the numbers of both trends were similar in 2014, closing slumped under 1000 in 2015 and the volume of shops opened gradually declined to almost 4000.
It can be seen that In 2016, the closing figure manifest a rapid growth to approximately 5000 and static for the next three years. However, the openings unit stayed constant till 2017 before showing a dip in 2018 to 3000. This was the lowest point for the opening figure. However, there was a gap of almost 2000 in the final year in two figures
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 11
- To be labelled a Work of Art a painting sculpture or other art form should display certain qualities that are unique However over the past century there has been a decline in the quality of prize winning artwork and it is now possible for quite ordinary p 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Buying things on the internet such asbooks air ticket and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping this way outweigh the disadvantages 89
- he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87912087912 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43334025349 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9605339226 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246517152665 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806855643282 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754742248914 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137010710639 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295061059559 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.