People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, it is a recent issue that communication technology and transportation development is a pivotal role in human lives causing people independently to choose carreer and the place to reside in. This issue, personally I believe, would bring about considerable merits for several reasons which will be elucidated more below.
Perhaps, in my standpoint, the advancement of technology brings people to work freely in order to complete their tasks without great difficulties, particularly graphic designers. They effortlessly achieve job satisfaction with virtual meeting applications (BlueJeans) improving their productivity without offline attendance at office. Furthermore, advanced technology systems and maintenance in means of transport offer public to frequently travel around. Regarding massive mobilities, the availability and equity of transportation in both countryside and urban areas are increasing each year. Therefore, travellers easily journey on short trip timings due to well-organised routes and schedules.
On the other hand, it seems to me that the demerits of this is vulnerable data leakage impacting on security level of organizations. Both companies and officials possibly spend high budget on combating this cybercrime. If they hardly dealt with this, they would meet bankruptcy resulting from great loss. In addition, massive global travelling will significantly contribute carbon footprint production. Besides the increasing level of vehicle emission generated by such activity, non-native visitors will produce land pollution, domestic waste, which continuously damages ecosystem balance.
In conclusion, while working and living in anywhere seem drawbacks to some extent, I would contradict that the positive advancement of digital communication and transportation are more significance. This includes integrated professional work and convenient access to modes of transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
- Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- In many societies there is growing emphasis on individualism with people prioritizing their personal goals and desires over collective interest Is this a positive or negative development 78
- More and more people are moving away from agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work What will be the consequence of this What solutions can you offer 84
- It is believed that a heavier sentence on citizens who embroil road traffic offences can vividly optimise the safety of road users Partially I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph 89
- Transporting children to school is said to be the responsibility of the government However some people think this is the responsibility of the parents Discuss both views and give your own 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1954887218 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31434848405 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718045112782 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5900359745 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206357708091 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593491314558 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617211631548 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123801271003 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618458778782 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.68 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1954887218 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31434848405 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718045112782 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5900359745 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206357708091 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593491314558 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617211631548 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123801271003 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618458778782 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.68 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.