Some journalists nowadays often distort the truth when publishing news to attract public attention. What are the problems and how can they be solved?
One of the most contemporary issues that receive concerns from various parts of the world is an alarming rate of fake news. It is the fact that true information regularly is perverted by some columnists with the aim of attracting viewers’ attention. In the following paragraphs, the problems would be analyzed with some plausible methods being suggested.
It can be undeniable that this trend could have adverse impacts on individuals and whole the society. To begin with, celebrities’ or influencers’ privacy often is illegally intruded on by paparazzi, which might lead to the exacerbation of their mental and physical health. Moreover, some organizations suffering from bogus rumors can face the significant decrease in sale revenue or the risk of bankruptcy. In addition, gutter press takes advantage of celebrities’ reputation to disclose unverified information about their sexual scandals, which unintentionally lead young generation to misconception of love and marriage.
To avoid this phenomenon worsening, some reasonable steps should be implemented. Firstly, it is high time governments released a strict censorship to put a curb on unsuitable contents, and sensational headlines existing on the social platforms, electronic newspaper. Simultaneously, a administrative penalty or imprison should be obliged journalists, reporters and publicers twisting the truth on purposes. Secondly, it would be a worthwhile idea if columnists were educated about professional ethics to compile responsible magazines.
In conclusion, this problems could result in several serious consequences which require immediate attention. Only when the government and individuals make concerted efforts could this trend be efficiently handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-29 | Phatle20010807 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ual scandals, which unintentionally lead young generation to misconception of lov...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... electronic newspaper. Simultaneously, a administrative penalty or imprison shou...
^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...responsible magazines. In conclusion, this problems could result in several seriou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94422310757 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39326243206 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669322709163 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1641170705 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17581979335 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565320976599 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397713343063 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942985936896 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278220710776 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.