The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.
The given chart illustrates how meat and poultry consumption in the USA change between 1955 and 2012.
Overall, there is a decrease in the use of beef and pork in the USA, while the consumption of 2 types of poultry experience an increase, with broilers' consumption enjoying the most considerable growth to become by far the most popular from 2009 onwards.
The pounds of beef consumed started at 56 pounds, after which it reached a peak of 90 pounds before declining to about 53 pounds at the beginning of 2012. The consumption of this meat is predicted to fall by approximately 3 pounds at the end of the year. In addition, the figures for the use of pork fluctuated continuously and is forecasted to decrease from 50 pounds in 1955 to around 43 pounds.
In the period of 6 years at the beginning, there was no consumption of broilers and turkey, after which the American started consuming at about 17 and 5 pounds respectively and gradually increased their use to about 60 and 12 pounds at the beginning of 2012. Besides, the figure for the use of broilers is likely to decline slightly to 55 pounds, while the consumption of turkey is going to remain stable at about 12 pounds in December 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree and disagree 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 67
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64319248826 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78361396203 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4965844878 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.285714286 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108449243438 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696257133237 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653615471124 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937663488821 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582259982367 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.