Companies and private invididuals, not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced.
It is sometimes believed that organizations and the citizens should pay money for the workers who clean the pollutants that the waste to the environment instead of the government. This essay strongly agree with this suggestion as now will be discussed.
The first argument behind my belief is that this can make the industrial companies be more responsible for the chemical they produce. If the amount of the waste is numerous, they have to pay more money for it which can have them raise the awareness about the importance of the environment.
Another point worth mentioning is that the authorities can save the national budget because they do not have to pay for the workers who clean up the waste. This can also means that the citizens just need to pay less tax for the environmental tax because organizations who produce more pollutants have to pay more than the people who do not.
In conclusion, I totally agree with this arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
- Despite increasing access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 61
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 73
- Despite increasing access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 61
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 73
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...s who clean up the waste. This can also means that the citizens just need to pay less...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o pay more than the people who do not. In conclusion, I totally agree with this...
^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... In conclusion, I totally agree with this arguments.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 41.998997996 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 1615.20841683 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 161.0 315.596192385 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85093167702 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75546880038 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 506.74238477 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0021258033 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199302373747 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868657876084 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654749380407 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101654259666 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644293109809 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 78.4519038076 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.