The given graph provides information about how much people in America spent on mobile phone, domestic fixed-line Services and international land services yearly from 2001 to 2010.
The initial impression from the graph is that the amount of money spent on cell phone, international fixed-line Services witnessed an upward trend. By contrast, this figure for national fixed land line Services had a decline in the same period.
In 2001, starting at 200 dollars the price for using mobile phones was substantially lower than that of worldwide and domestic with just about 250 and 700 dollars respectively. There was a slight increase in overseas landlines over the 5 years and then it witnessed a period of stability around 300 dollars. Meanwhile, the figure for cellphone services significantly plunged to 500 in 2006. In contrast, domestic landline service saw a considerable decline on 500 at the same time
At the end of period, cellphone services overtook other services to become highest with more than about 750 dollars. Following by national fixed-line services which experienced a substantially dip to 400 in 2010. The number of international landlines was the lowest with just on 300 dollars during the period of chart
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- process of Pe uh raw tea and ripe tea 78
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 73
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...en graph provides information about how much people in America spent on mobile phone...
^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('substantially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('dip') instead of another adjective.
...l fixed-line services which experienced a substantially dip to 400 in 2010. The number of internati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24365482234 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89147678468 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9800069992 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296062425757 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130499399273 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108555522192 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216905619569 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114554685599 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.