There are many advertisements directed at children. Parents argue that children are misled, while advertisers consider advertising a source of useful information. What is your opinion?
While a school of thought holds that advertisements can deprave children, another one claims that the key is advertising provides people with valuable information. Personally, I side with the latter view.
It is understandable why some people support the opinion that advertising get harm to children. The key rationale is that, they lack of cognitive or awareness to distinguish the truth is and their children tend to put pressure on their parent to buy things. However, this thinking is not sound, in the way of educating upbringing children, discipline and train them to stop pestering for things that unnecessary is important. This behavior can affect to future personality. On this count, the idea that advertising impacts badly on children is actually invalid.
In lieu of preventing young kids from approaching advertisements early, I am convinced that it is a good way for them to learn outside school. Firstly, advertisements are a condensed message consisting of many meaning from advertisers. From that, kids can gain mire knowledge and study from them, facilitate to imagine. Secondly, advertising is checked before launching so that harmful advertisements at least be banned or censored by specific department. This is a powerful testament to how advertising can provide children more valuable information.
In conclusion, while it may be justifiable for children to avoid watching advertising, I still believe that children should approach more for their learning process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48051948052 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18721161403 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0548020125 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330270788611 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116240867192 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863721659612 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191462820098 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477279472966 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.