The line graph illustrates how many people in America spent on mobile phones, domestic and worldwide landline services over the period of 9 years.
In general, what stands out from the line graph is that the number of cell phones and international fixed-line services rose, in contrast, there was a decline gradual in the amount of money that was expensed on the national fixed-line during the period shown.
At the beginning of the period, the proportion of national fixed-line made up 700$ and became the highest figure, while overseas landline services just took up nearly 300$ at the same time. Following that service, the cell phone was used lowest in 3 different services, with 200$. In the next 5 years, the figure for domestic landlines suddenly dropped to the same point as the number of international services at 500$.
During the next 4 years, a significant growth of more than 700 was witnessed in the figure of international fixed-line service in 2010, while there was a steady decline from 500 to 400$ in the number of national services. Likewise, domestic and overseas services enormously changed, Cell phones stayed uniform at 300$ over the last few years.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...oportion of national fixed-line made up 700$ and became the highest figure, while ov...
^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...s landline services just took up nearly 300$ at the same time. Following that servic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...ed lowest in 3 different services, with 200$. In the next 5 years, the figure for do...
^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...the number of international services at 500$. During the next 4 years, a significan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
... there was a steady decline from 500 to 400$ in the number of national services. Lik...
^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
... changed, Cell phones stayed uniform at 300$ over the last few years.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01020408163 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65327707128 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1347144247 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.285714286 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263999604994 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125070519631 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788549691952 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185756570563 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578577126825 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.