in their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, advertisements are becoming one of the most effective ways for companies to introduce their products widely to people all around the world. In their advertising, Businesses today typically stress the fact that their products are novel in some way in their advertising. This is due to the fact that consumers are usually attracted to something which has novel parts. While there are some benefits behind this situation, I personally believe that the drawbacks are outweighed.
When it comes to the merit of this phenomenon, It is clear that bringing novelty features in advertisements can help the businesses improve their profit. This is the reason of many people prefer to buy the products which have a couple of new parts to the original ones. They believe that something new is something having developments, so that they would like to pay more to have the more advanced versions. Apple, for example, earns a lot of money for selling their new productions, such as the Iphone 11 and Iphone 11 plus, every year.
However, I strongly think that this kind of advertising has negative impacts. First and foremost, there are many products which do not have similarities with its advertisements. They are introduced to have rocket improvements, while the truth is that the motivations are pretty slight. This means consumers lose more money to have the new products having the quality that are slightly better than the existing ones. On the other hand, this phenomenon can also make the environment worse and worse since people usually through the old versions, which are replaced with the new ones. If these products are not treated in an effective way, it can emit a lot of rubbish in the habitat, which can lead to the air, soil and water pollutions for instance.
In conclusion, while this type of advertisement can help businesses reach their supposed profit, I think that it is a negative improvement as its demonstration for environment and the waste of people’s budgets for them.
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
- Some people think that all university students sould study whatever they like Others believe that they shoyld only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 78
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real needs of the society in which those products are sold Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
- Some people think that all university students sould study whatever they like Others believe that they shoyld only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ones. If these products are not treated in an effective way, it can emit a lot of rubbish in the ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01488095238 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81505301108 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9698282651 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324312015658 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109705573591 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775079495122 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206778258992 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673995862734 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.