Some people think they have right to use as much fresh water as they want. Others believe government should tightly control the use of fresh waters as it is limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, it is hard to find clear and drinkable water so that the government should apply a policy to restrict water consumption. Because of this, people’s opinions are divided. While some people think that they can consume as much water as they can, other argue that it is mandatory for government to set a rule on water consumption. Evaluating about water usage, this essay will discuss both sides and try to make a solid conclusion at the end.
To start with, it is evident that water is renewable resources. Proponents argue that water sources are abundant so that it is not necessary for limiting water consumption due to hydrology cycle. By this, it means there are plenty sources for collecting water. For instance, ground water and atmospheric are places which have much water. Furthermore, those who support this statement think that there are many methods to collect fresh water. It is said that collecting fresh water could possibly increase water availability. Several methods such as salt water distillation and fog nets are considered as the best way to increase the amount of water usage.
By contrast, opponents argue that water availability is decreasing although water is renewable resources due to global warming and environmental pollution. This means that water sources are vulnerable for being contaminated and having drought. Provided some information, several ground water have experienced drought and rain water from atmosphere become more and more acid due to pollutant gasses. In addition, it can be seen that methods to collect fresh water are considerably expensive. Because of this, several countries especially developed countries hardly apply those methods. It means the governments should take a step for limiting water usage.
In conclusion, I prefer that governments provide some policy to reduce water consumption due to pollution and extreme temperature. It is unwise to consume the amount of water without thinking the threats which can cause unavailability of water.
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers What are reasons behind this Is it positive or negative development 73
- Some people think they have right to use as much fresh water as they want Others believe government should tightly control the use of fresh waters as it is limited resource Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In order to solve traffic problems government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 73
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that it is a good thing while others think it has disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... It is said that collecting fresh water could possibly increase water availability. Several me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83719607695 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.496665075 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2631578947 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33292906969 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119758274412 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582481039016 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22477704096 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548036481946 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.