Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development
I believe that technology improvement can make human lead a better life, but technology may also generate lots of tough issues. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement that governments should place few restrictions on scientific research and development.
Indeed, in twentieth century, many extraordinary scientists and engineers devoted their time and energy to creating lots of outstanding invention, such cars and airplanes. Because the governments did not set lots of strict laws to restrict these scientists and engineers, they could fully utilize their ability to create lots of these practical inventions and help many undeveloped countries to industrialize. In the 2010s, lots of world-class companies, such as Google and Facebook, are still developing a good deal of advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and virtual reality. These technologies can actually make people have a brighter future.
However, if governments do not put any restrictions on scientific research and development, it will cause numerous ethical issues. For example, in the 1990s, there were many biologists actively engaging in doing some research about human cloning. People may utilize this technology to proliferate, but it would produce lots of tough ethnical issues. Children would not know who were his or her parents and might encounter many genetic diseases. Moreover, scientists might also use this technology to do something illegal, and they might cultivate lots of cloning animals and cooperate with other merchants to gain illegal profits. Thus, in 1995, Taiwanese government decided to legislate prevent these scientists to break the laws. In contrast, other foreign governments, such as China and North Korea, didn’t actively legislate to restrict their scientists. Thus, there are many illegally biological experiments conducted in these countries, and many ethical problems have been generated subsequently.
Moreover, if governments place few restrictions on scientific research and development, it will generate lots of environmental problems. Take TSMC, which is the top-notch semiconductor enterprise in the entire world, as an example. In 1986, Taiwanese government decided to establish TSMC at Hsinchu city to develop semiconductor industry in Taiwan. However, Taiwanese government didn’t set any laws to prevent this company from polluting the environment. Thus, TSMC produce lots of harmful materials, such as metal pollutants and waste water. PM2.5 in Hsinchu city also exceed the normal standard. To deal with these issues, the local government determined to set a series of strict laws to address these problems. Furthermore, the local government also asked TSMC reduce the discharging amount of waste water, or TSMC would be fined up to five million dollars. As a result, the quality of water and air in Hsinchu city became better and better, and the poisonous materials were never detected again. On the contrary, if the local government did not ask TSMC to improve these issues, there might be more environmental problems produced in Hsinchu city.
Ideally, technologies can make people lead a greater life and improve our society. However, if the government do not set many strict laws, it will produce lots of serious problems. Thus, I disagree with the statement that the government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Children should spend more time studying and playing or helping with the household chores 60
- Agree or disagree Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school 73
- Would you prefer to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city 66
- Agree or disagree Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school 50
- People who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill Agree or disagree 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2891.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61359223301 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01181010262 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2248420004 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.074074074 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0740740741 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81481481481 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284627920176 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859379688144 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146916800814 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191403729104 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947959486551 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.