The phenomenon of people themselves creating films for the support of digital technology has been growing in popularity, not just big companies. From my point of view, I consider this a positive development.
I am of the opinion that this is a positive trend as because it offer affordability to low-income people. This can be explained by the fact that with the development of technology, people can download some useful applications especialing in editing pictures and videos with no usage fee. As a result, they gain the ability to make fantastic films according to their hobbies and capturing memories in life, which they can open to see in the later future. For example, CAPCUT, a widespead app to make films, recording the significant growth in the number of users, with about 50% in 2023.
Another reason is that it promote creativity of young people. Obviously, without fees, people can be given great chances of accessing effective technology to produce high-quality films. Humans can learn and practice to take videos, edit and improve their skills in film industry. Therefore, they comfortably meet their demand to continue pursuing their hobby in every situation. This has been successfully in a part in marketing industry, who are required to have capacity of manufacturing films and they are ready to show that skill in their CV to get a gold ticket to enter a big corporation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology is a powerful tool which serve as a spingboard for people to practice producing films by themselves. It is expected that in the five following years, there will be a part of fully-creative and potential young people
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing people populations Would it be better to build houses in existing towns and cities or to develop new towns in rural areas
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 56
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Today TV channels provide more men s sports than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
... this is a positive trend as because it offer affordability to low-income people. Thi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice taking'.
Suggestion: practice taking
...igh-quality films. Humans can learn and practice to take videos, edit and improve their skills i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05818181818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9590349108 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596363636364 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1358113967 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18856702739 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602070278561 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463105899944 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112594834608 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016215465069 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.