The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Forton Valley City from 2000 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Forton Valley City from 2000 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration depicts information regarding how Forton Valley City transformed between 2000 and 2010. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that this location experienced extensive transformations and modifications, the most noticeable of which is the alternation of Forton University, the movement of K.G. School, and the addition of Versity Cafe.

Regarding the western side of the location, while the shopping center adjacent to Sheffield Road remained untouched, the land catering to farm tasks was demolished to make way for an additional playground. Moreover, K.G. School, which was formerly situated across, was reconstructed in the place which was originally occupied by a dairy farm. Aside from the school, a toy shop was established.

Concerning the eastern side of the location, in 2010, a public library and Forton University were erected to replace the city hall and K.G.School respectively. To the south of the side, an additional car park was constructed adjacent to the prior one. Moreover, the park, situated aside from the car park in 2000, was demolished and renovated by Vercity Cafe.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-25 thaocbh 78 view
Essays by user thaocbh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: School
...rected to replace the city hall and K.G.School respectively. To the south of the side,...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11725324651 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1268564083 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120457042516 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612074130474 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646308130173 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893115525216 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479952804834 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.