The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The illustrations depict the energy consumption for various purposes and how much gas emissions discharge from this energy in an Australian household on average. Overall, it is relatively apparent that heating consumes the highest amount of energy, yet water heating is the culprit which releases greenhouse gas most substantially.
Regarding household energy consumption, heating emits the most significantly, recording 42%. Meanwhile lesser contributions are recorded in domains of water heating and other appliances, respectively occupying 30% and 15%. Additionally, the percentage of cooling (2%) is the most negligible, followed by lighting consumption whose proportion is twofold that of cooling. Finally, refrigeration contributes 7% in the sum of energy usage, approximately three times higher than cooling does.
Concerning greenhouse gas releases from Australian domestic appliances, water heating is attributable to the most significant driver, accounting for 32%, which is exactly quadrupling the proportion of emissions lighting releases. In addition, the proportion of heating emissions occupies 15%, which is five times higher than that of cooling. Moreover, the percentage of refrigeration is precisely half of that of other appliances, documented as 14% and 28% in turn.
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... the most significantly, recording 42%. Meanwhile lesser contributions are recorded in do...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0652173913 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3198292939 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58152173913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4100681246 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189868620843 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784477283816 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924972570901 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144171288935 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859799986055 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 11.4140731707 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.