Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last decade, the world has developed significantly in terms of science, technology, education,... etc. Many developing nations have risen to one of the richest nations in the world such as China and Korea. However, lots of countries are still in poverty situations that are desperately in need of money to feed their citizens. Rich countries nowadays are donating lots of money to poorer countries with an aim of solving this problem although many people argue that this generous behavior is not practical enough and other types of aid are needed. From my personal point of view, I strongly agree with the statement and shall explain my opinions below.
I believe that financial aid is not as useless as most people claim as it can still be useful in the short term. First and foremost, poor people need food the most, and they cannot live without eating something for a few days. Therefore the immediate need for money to buy food is crucial in fighting poverty. Besides, funds from other developed countries can be used to construct schools, hospitals, and houses that are very necessary for poor citizens. Money can also help build factories that produce food and create jobs for jobless people. However, not as good as it sounds, poor countries are still in poverty condition after those funds run out.
It is obvious that money is not unlimited and it depletes very fast, especially when we don't know how to use it wisely. As the statement said before, providing financial aid is not enough to solve poverty, we need to teach them how to earn money by themselves. By providing free education, dedicated and committed teachers with an aim of teaching kids in these poor nations, we can completely eradicate poverty in the near future. Education is the core of every nation, if those kids are smart enough to earn money in order to buy food, poverty will not be a thing to be considered anymore. Moreover, they can change their nations to become wealthier so their countries with no more in need of any aid from other nations. For instance, most countries in Africa are very poor, but Quang Linh (a Vietnamese youtube guy) has taught them how to cultivate by themselves and these African's lives have changed significantly.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that giving money to developing countries can help ease poverty conditions in some ways. However, to solve the problem completely, it is crucial to provide high-quality education to these countries. Therefore, other types of help are extremely vital in the fight against poverty, give them a fish rod, not some fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... terms of science, technology, education,... etc. Many developing nations have ris...
^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ithout eating something for a few days. Therefore the immediate need for money to buy foo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... depletes very fast, especially when we dont know how to use it wisely. As the stat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89066059226 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60774980937 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51708428246 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7044136576 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.35 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.95 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302976592467 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864467593746 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772057824118 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192558469362 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408204124924 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.