During the last decades, an innumerable number of plant and animal species have become extinct or have been in danger of extinction for one reason or another. However, some governments and environmentalists have taken some conducive steps toward saving endangered plants and animals. There are different opinions on how involved governments should be in this process and how much money the governments should pour into this channel. Some people hold the idea that governments should not spend more money on saving near-extinction animals or plants than they do now. Others, with whom I comply, believe that governments' efforts are inadequate so far, and governments must allocate more budgets to this process than before. In what follows, I will delineate my viewpoint on the ground of two persuasive reasons.
Without a doubt, the most consequential point corroborating my stance on this subject is that human activities are the main reason that these animals and plants are in danger of extinction. Governments usually do not make any effort to thwart those activities leading to animal or plant extinction since they do not regard it as important as political or social issues. Hence, they must compensate for their negligence by pouring vast amounts of money whenever needed to save an endangered animal or plant. For instance, in Iran, a scarce tiger species is near extinction because of overhunting in recent decades and the Iran government's lack of competency in controlling these overhunting activities. Currently, many Iranian unanimously agree that the government should take some serious steps toward saving this tiger and helping it to recover again. Therefore, this example illustrates that societies must do whatever they can to save endangered flora and fauna.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that some actions that societies take in order to save animals and plants, regardless of how expensive they would be, not only benefit those animals or plants but also provide the local and global societies with some invaluable results. Take a certain kind of bird that is in danger of extinction because of air pollution in an urban area. This high level of pollution in the urban environment can be transported to nearby areas by winds. On the other hand, the rate of lung cancer has increased dramatically in urban areas in recent decades. Therefore, if the government allocates enough budget to increase the quality of air in urban areas, both individuals and nearby animals benefit from this decision.
To make the long story short, reflecting upon all the aforementioned grounds, one soon realizes that societies must pay more attention to animals and plants. Governments should do whatever they can to improve the animals' and plants' living quality and help those that are in danger of extinction, no matter how much money these actions would cost, for the sake of those animals and plants, as well as themselves and other human beings.
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals Write a response in whic
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within this group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing 58
- Which one do you think is important to long lasting friendship 1 Help you when you need 2 Share same interest and hobby3 mutual trust 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2571.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2044534413 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77093269315 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508097165992 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4418606025 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.315789474 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259629714137 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737568939425 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494203215775 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15847588818 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112418949677 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.