The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trios taken by drivers in 2005.
The bar graph elucidates the percentage of reasons for taking a car trip by genders in 2005.
It is evident from the graph that, the work purpose was dominated by men drivers, with the percentage of over 50. The recreation purpose had the second highest place of around 11%. The highest purpose for the women drivers to take the car was for the work but less frequent than men drivers (around 40%) . Women drove the car very often, less than 20% of their times for the shopping. Courses purpose was recorded at around 14% for women drivers.
The rest of reasons were reached at below 10% of car usages in 2005. Bank and running errands took 10% of women time to drive the car whilst close to 0% of men spent their time on those purposes. Just below 10% of women drove the car to visit their friends compared to half of those for men. Visiting towns were most popular reasons among men drivers - 10% compared to 5% for women.
Both genders experienced the most of car used for the work. While the shopping dominated the reasons for women to use a car, most men drove the car for recreational purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-28 | Malita | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | mifas meleraroth | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 68
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 80
- The diagram below shows the changes in that area of Mary farmland in England from 1960 to 2000. 60
- The chart below shows information about Heart Attacks by Age and Gender in USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 201 200
No. of Characters: 865 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.765 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.303 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.154 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 16 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 8 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.71 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4