Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an idea that learners entering universities need tuition support from the government. In this essay, although I find full scholarships a reasonable method for helping the poor students or the excellent candidates, the education budgets in developing countries are deposited in order to reinvest in future education infrastructure.
On the one hand, the governments should provide full financial help to special students. First of all, paying full cost of learning at universities allows poor students who come from low income families to reduce their financial burden. As a result, these students should not pay attention to finding a part-time job in order to complete fee responsibilities, thus gaining necessary knowledges. This is the most perfect platform for graduates to have a well-paid job these days. Moreover, generating full scholarships encourages excellent learners to pay full time on researching and finding out new inventions when they are at university. This results in producing talented scientists or great contributors in the next generations. These evidences could enable the government to plan a high education budget to aid these students who need financial supports.
On the other hand, covering all fees of studying universities for all students is not significant because upgrading institution infrastructure and other sufficient financial aids could make university costs more comfortable. Specifically, investing in modern and high tech education infrastructures could allow the students who live in remote provinces to access online courses, thus these students can save the high costs of commuting and accommodation in expensive cities. As a result, they can cover their learning fees after high school, therefore, there are less out-cash flows and more in-cash flows of the government budget to reinvest in the education infrastructure. Additionally, there are several sufficient financial aids which generate a comfortable learning path for students. Example, the state bank of Vietnam has a loan package with a low interest rate to help students fulfill university fees. This means these students only give period principals and cheap interests after they finish university programs. A brief summary, this essay also mentions education infrastructure upgrades and learning loan packages instead of focusing on free full fees.
In conclusion, the bill of education fees should be on the government that is significant to some special situations while popular education loans and upgrading studying institutions can make the student life more leisure.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than when they were at school Why is this What can be done to solve the problem 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 84
- The diagrams below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office 56
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ps encourages excellent learners to pay full time on researching and finding out new inve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1115, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to loan'
Suggestion: to loan
...on infrastructure upgrades and learning loan packages instead of focusing on free fu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67179487179 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14183663 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8011820144 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.117647059 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263952301611 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839734965728 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376004263406 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160086260308 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510095126121 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.