In many countries people increasingly talk about money: how much they earn or how much they pay for things in their daily conversations. Why? Is this a positive or negative trend?
It is a true fact that a financial topic is so popular for humans to chat together such as income and expenditure. In my essay, although this could bring several great things, it may also attach some unexpected results.
On the one hand, sharing financial situations allows us to get several advantageous benefits. First of all, the helpful experiences to reduce expenditure or tips to make incomes higher should be taken out in communications. This could be precious knowledges for teenagers who lack of financial lessons in the reality. As a result, chatting about earning and spending topics may support to plan a reasonable personal financial budgets. Based on the obvious plans, these teenagers have a determined future prospect. Additionally, sometimes talking about money could encourage participants to motivate to work hard for covering the daily costs. For example, a couple who just got married must take all financial problems to understand the roles and responsibilities of each other. Thus it helps these people to reduce the financial burden in hustle and bustle life.
On the other hand, there are some negative effects that could stem from overtaking about salaries and costs in daily chats. Specifically, money is a sensitive topic because it is personal informations in Western countries. Most employers do not want to show the number of either income or expenditure. For example, there are two people who being high school classmates. One has a well-paid job at a top-ranked company in Ho Chi Minh city. Other one has low-income as a worker at a factory. In this situation, the financial topic makes them uncomfortable. Moreover, daily mentioning about money could lead overvalue of financial factors in social life. If the social life could be controlled by financial decisions, there shall not be meaningful factors such as hobbies and emotions. So, over focusing on money could pull in negative thoughts.
In conclusion, sharing personal financial statements could be beneficial to some extent while overtaking them may bring some disadvantageous experiences to someone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-17 | Huwan Diamonds | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Huwan Diamonds | 73 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen a pencil or brush What are the reasons for this Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development 84
- The table shows the population ratio of females per 100 males in six different areas Africa Asia Europe North America Central America and Oceania in 1995 and 2005 Summarize and report key features
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- This image displays the process of pineapple production 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...les and responsibilities of each other. Thus it helps these people to reduce the fin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn countries. Most employers do not want to show the number of either income or e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, talking about, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30239520958 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99817225927 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.980249745 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9047619048 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103965173059 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339424000877 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361202040806 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561482191397 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040428193006 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.