Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people?
Many museums and historical locations are crucially visited by tourists and not the local. This essay could reveal several causes and recommend diverse solutions to tackle them.
There are some reasons why the negative citizens are not interested in travel the places which are traditional theatres, historical sites. First of all, these locations are not impressive the local because they deeply and previously fathom them. For example, Vietnam War Museum is based in Ho Chi Minh City. Foreigners are keen on this museum however few Saigon people drops around it. A behind reason is that Ho Chi Minh City citizens are similar with the museums as they learned well the place via the historical subject. So, traveling to local sites has been finding it unsignificant for local people. Additionally, one crucial bargain of preventing local people come to historical sites is charges to enter these doors. This means the residential has to pay a fee to wander these buildings which are not magnificent to the local. For instant, there are available activities without any charge such as malls, café stores and night outdoor markets.
Although several obstacles could not encourage the local to touring places, various approaches might address this phenomenon. Firstly, government or management authorities redecorate museum and historical places in combination with making these place new and advance. The particular circumstance is that the Thong Nhat Palace no longer lacked Vietnamese tourists who have been willing to enjoy a short tour at the palace on weekend so it seems to be cutting aged because of the everlasting redecoration of its authority. Moreover, tourism agencies should organize much free charged outdoor activities nearby these places as well as connect non-fee musical events belonging to tour calendas of travelling to the traditional places. This is meaningful and pleasant to the negative tourists when they anticipate weekend plans and spend their free time on these locations because they are absolutely free.
In conclusion, the absence of much overseas tourists and the lack of the local at the traditional sites are unavoidable and inevitable however practical implementations could trigger the explosion of negative tourists to these places.
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in its young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 84
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress but they should be concerned about the quality at work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen a pencil or brush What are the reasons for this Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this place' or 'these places'?
Suggestion: this place; these places
...rical places in combination with making these place new and advance. The particular circums...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... free. In conclusion, the absence of much overseas tourists and the lack of the l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41971830986 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76605662131 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4910010865 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25025173945 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870154591737 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930068001819 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160107023088 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651552163698 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.