Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people?
It is true that foreign tourists mainly are interested in museum and historical place and local attendance is low negatively. This essay not only might reveal behind reasons of this reality but also recommend some solutions to appeal the local.
There are diverse causes which have been leading to low percentage of the local’s absence at traditional places. First of all, the domestical citizens are too familiar with these locations because of their rich awareness of the local culture and history. The local is not attractive by something which they deeply and previously have fathomed them when learning in school educations. For example, the Vietnam War Museum have been welcoming a significant overseas traveler quantity each year but not the local people. The primary reason is that the Vietnamese was learnt so much the Vietnam War in the history subject and there is no reason why they tend to visit an exhibition that display what they understood sharply. Additionally, museum and historical exhibitions are so outdated and monotonous that the negative people anticipate to explore them. In other word, historical places are not magnificent to the local as these collections are inadequate. This further discourages the insiders.
To appeal domestical residents to museum and historical locations, diverse approach could be implemented simultaneously. Local authorities who manage these sites have to redecorate them and make them more attractive and stunning as well as organize continuously outdoors activities nearby the historical remarkable places. One particular circumstance is that the Thong Nhat Palace has been appealing a significant dimension of the local citizens visiting its each month. This positive outcome results from the local government effort which it may well be a combination of outdoor musical events occurring at the front of the Palace and eternal advance redecorations for this place. Applying this way helps the palace to be worth a visit. Moreover, governors could invest in technological applications in order to exhibit culture and historical shows. For example, the Science and Art Museum of Ho Chi Minh City has promulgated cutting edge display devices including three dimensional effects and advance technology lasers to rekindle the interest of the local. The performance of this implementation is outstanding and the ratio of attendance coming from Ho Chi Minh City dramatically has been increasing since these display systems were devised by the technical director of the Museum.
In conclusion, several bargains limiting appearance in these above - mentioned traditional places of negative people is inevitable and unavoidable however smooth collaborative approaches might address the fact profitably.
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others believe that the main interest is in world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below give information about the world s top three producers for four different dairy products milk cheese butter milk powder in the year of 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: IT_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...imension of the local citizens visiting its each month. This positive outcome resul...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57857142857 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98325377616 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57380952381 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6796096629 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.315789474 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291958255941 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822627935267 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491974214136 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157318973262 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644175475792 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.