The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000.
The provided chart gives the number of four different types of transportation that people in European city used between 1960 and 2000. Overall, it can be admitted that the car percentage experienced a significant increase. In contrast, the figure for foot declined dramatically.
In 1960, the proportion of people using car was about 6%, and it inclined to 28% after one year. It was in 2000 that the figure for car rose significantly, reaching a peak of 39%, making it the highest chosen transportation. In 1960, there were around 18% of people choosing bus as their transportation, and it had a noticeable rise, around 26%. However, it fell slightly to 16% in 2000.
At the beginning of the period, there were 25% of bike used by people, but the figure for it dropped to 5% after 2 years, causing the least favorite mode of transportation. Meanwhile, it was foot having a big proportion of use, about 33%, and it was the highest in 1960. After 2 years, it felt significantly to 9%.
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand agree or disagree 73
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our live How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative development 61
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subject in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 56
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 56
- It is suggested that all the young adults undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...here were around 18% of people choosing bus as their transportation, and it had a n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73255813953 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01494833567 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4222710891 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248683967345 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888957271611 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113715170824 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168912562949 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627997181563 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.