In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Traffic jam is one of the problems in big cities, in order to reduce this problem, car owners’ taxation should be applied by government and the income by being applied this rule should possibly enhance public transportation. This essay will explain the benefits and drawbacks of this solution.
One the one hand, it can be surely admitted that, if the government applied rule on private transportations taxation, specifically cars, it would possibly limit the number of vehicles on the streets, leading to decreasing of congestion. By this, it seems that more and more individuals will use public transportation since they will consider the amount of tax that they should pay if they ride their own transportation. Giving some example, in many developed countries such as UK and Australia, the inhabitance more prefers to use public transportations. Because of this, they could improve their public transportations such as trains and trams. In addition, not only could they limit traffic jam, but reduce pollutant gasses as well. This means that air quality will increase so that respiratory diseases decline could possibly happen. For example, Japan has higher rate of public health since public transportation such as bullet trains is main transportation.
On the other hand, it can be said that private transportation taxation is quite costly so that it could possibly cause the decline of people’s earnings as they have to pay for higher taxes, especially for cars owners. This is obvious that most of their earnings would be possibly spent on paying tax. Providing some evidence, people who have more than one car are suffer from this rule. Furthermore, cars’ selling industries is the most affected sectors. If the government adjusted this rule, it would harm the cars’ industries inasmuch public transportation is the chosen one for people, causing the disadvantages for cars’ seller.
In conclusion, it can be seen that the benefits of private transportation taxation are reducing of traffic jam and increasing of air quality. The possible drawbacks of this rule are people’s income declining and detriment of cars’ sellers.
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subject in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 56
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000 78
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
... the government applied rule on private transportations taxation, specifically cars, it would p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 814, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...se so that respiratory diseases decline could possibly happen. For example, Japan has higher r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ion taxation is quite costly so that it could possibly cause the decline of people’s earnings ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
..., people who have more than one car are suffer from this rule. Furthermore, cars’ sell...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30498533724 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99747487919 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489736070381 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2561107792 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237323783907 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07925631912 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602614972066 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147845752507 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356432069437 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.