The bar chart give information about people living in Australia and living outside Australia, in urban, rural and countryside from 1995 to 2010.
According to the chart, during the period from 1995 to 2010 the percentage of who born in Australia increased significantly by twenty percent and people live outside Australia reach the maximum. While the percentage who lived in Australia decreased slightly in two town and rural by about ten percent and fifteen percent respectively.
Look at the first bar chart is concerned, it is clear that the percentage who lived in Australia decreased only in rural and town by ten percent and twenty percent in 2010 from 20% and 30% to 10%. Meanwhile, the rate of people who born in Australia is highest in both years and increased significantly from 45% to 60%.
As far as the next period is concerned. It can be seen that, the people born outside in Australia has the largest increased in the percentage lived over the 15-year period from 1995 to 2010, from 60% to 80% and highest among three areas. By contrast, the people born in Australia of town and rural was still lowest. Especially, rural areas has decreased significantly when 40% in 1995 to 2% in 2010 and twin higher slightly by 2 percent.
All in all, there are a wide differences in loved areas between three areas which illustrated in this chart. These differences may be result of the number of population or the number of areas required in a certain country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 73
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that art such as painting and music does not directly improve quality of people s life so government should spend money on other areas To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...iod from 1995 to 2010 the percentage of who born in Australia increased significant...
^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ncreased significantly from 45% to 60%. As far as the next period is concerned. It...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74347826087 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68541182558 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482608695652 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0444802151 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385762671721 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154028419372 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12103015622 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246136462585 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136015634371 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.