The line graph below shows the monthly ridership of four separate transportation forms in a European metropolitan area between 1980 and 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about the number of visitors who usage of different kinds of green transportation in a European urban area over 50 years from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, it can be seen that there were 2 opposite trends for these 4 figures. While the people who travel by subway, tram, and bike share are witnessed a progress, the number of tourists using bus service had slightly reduced over the period.
Looking at the chart for more details, the subway users had the highest figure in 1980, at 2.5 million people, but then it improved considerably from 1980 to 2010. over 10 years later, after remaining statically, it is projected to grow to 4 million people by the end of the chart. The similar was true for the tram, starting at nearly 0.5 million, it increased significantly until 2020 and is projected to reach at 2 million people in 2030. Regarding bike share transport, starting at nearly 0,5 million people in 2000, it progressed slightly, since then it has remained fairly unchanged for 10 years.
In contrast, the trend for bus was 1,5 million people, which stood in the 2 ranks in 1980. since then it had a declined considerably and the figure with an expected value of this trend will decrease minimally in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The graph below shows percentage of workers in five European countries taking fixed stays or more sickness absence per year from 1991 to 2001 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- Some people think that detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV can have a bad influence on the public so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... area over 50 years from 1980 to 2030. Overall, it can be seen that there were ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had slightly reduced over the period. Looking at the chart for more details, t...
^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...mproved considerably from 1980 to 2010. over 10 years later, after remaining statica...
^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as true for the tram, starting at nearly 0.5 million, it increased significantly ...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...le, which stood in the 2 ranks in 1980. since then it had a declined considerably and...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trend will decrease minimally in 2030.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8202764977 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57768922217 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599078341014 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5294232313 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086678357551 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383324003913 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599058388237 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069015855186 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078792715356 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... area over 50 years from 1980 to 2030. Overall, it can be seen that there were ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had slightly reduced over the period. Looking at the chart for more details, t...
^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...mproved considerably from 1980 to 2010. over 10 years later, after remaining statica...
^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as true for the tram, starting at nearly 0.5 million, it increased significantly ...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...le, which stood in the 2 ranks in 1980. since then it had a declined considerably and...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trend will decrease minimally in 2030.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8202764977 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57768922217 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599078341014 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5294232313 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086678357551 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383324003913 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599058388237 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069015855186 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078792715356 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.