Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Which do you prefer, working three days a week for long hours or working five days a week for shorter hours? This is a widely debated question in the university recently. While many people prefer to work three days for long hours. I just disagree with them, and I think working five days a week for short hours is definitely a better choice.
The first reason why I prefer to work five days for short hours is that I can work more efficiently and be more productive. Admittedly, working for long hours makes it possible for us to finish things in one go. However, if we can view this from a different perspective. Working a long time will surely make us tired and anxious. We tend to feel tense if we keep working all the time. But if we choose to work for short time. It means we can have a rest during work time. We can drink some tea and talk with workmates about the job. In this way, we keep a better mood and our efficiency at work can improve. In the same time, when we communicate with workmates, we bounce thoughts with each other, it will be easier for us to solve the problems. So we can be more productive.
Secondly, working five days for short hours is a healthier life schedule than working three days for long. We have more time to rest and do exercises if we work for shorter hours in a day. We can sleep a longer time in the morning. And there is also enough time for us to exercise after working the whole day. We may do some other things with our family and friends even when we back home. But if we work for longer hours, we won't have enough time to do other things in the three days. So working five days for shorter hours ensure us a healthier schedule.
To conclude, it's absolutely more efficient and healthier for us to work five days for shorter hours, so I prefer to working five days for shorter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- coal ash 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- quackers 3
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... us a healthier schedule. To conclude, its absolutely more efficient and healthier...
^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'work'?
Suggestion: work
... days for shorter hours, so I prefer to working five days for shorter.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26801152738 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24647486895 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420749279539 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8417510947 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.3913043478 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0869565217 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427094950825 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15899611982 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143595161079 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33304547894 0.150856017488 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111715957678 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.2 11.7677419355 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 58.1214874552 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.89 10.9000537634 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.2 8.01818996416 77% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.