It is argued that increasing the minimum age for drivers can significantly enhance road safety. While I believe that this measure can be effective in reducing reckless driving, I am not fully in agreement with it. Instead, I believe that it should be accompanied by other approaches such as imposing stricter punishments and improving public transportation services.
Undeniably, implementing a higher minimum legal age for driving can enhance road safety by decreasing the number of traffic accidents. This is due to the fact that younger drivers, who may lack experience and maturity, are more prone to engaging in dangerous and reckless driving behaviors that put themselves and other commuters in danger. By requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain their license, they are more likely to be responsible and cautious drivers who contribute to a safer and more secure driving environment for everyone.
While increasing the minimum legal driving age can certainly reduce traffic accidents and make roads safer, it is not the most effective solution on its own. To achieve the best results, there are two other measures that should be implemented in addition to raising the age limit. Firstly, the government should enforce stricter punishments to deter drivers from committing traffic-based offenses, such as imposing heavy fines or revoking licenses for drivers who exceed the speed limit or drive under the influence of alcohol. Secondly, the government can enhance the public transportation infrastructure, such as providing more bus and train services to encourage citizens to use them in their daily life. For instance, the success of Singapore's Mass Rapid Transit system has significantly reduced the number of private vehicles on the roads, resulting in fewer accidents and a safer environment for commuters.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge the potential benefits of raising the minimum driving age, I disagree that it is the most effective solution for improving road safety. Rather, a combination of approaches, such as imposing stricter penalties for traffic violations and improving public transportation, would be more optimal. It is important for authorities to consider all viable options in addressing the issue of traffic accidents.
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 73
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48295454545 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04010724582 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8509519338 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188811501906 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076349166167 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822528793104 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121370837357 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013408311166 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48295454545 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04010724582 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8509519338 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188811501906 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076349166167 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822528793104 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121370837357 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013408311166 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.