Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
Wildlife conservation has been a disputable topic for a few decades. A group of people claim that it takes so many resources and public attentions than it should. I discontent with this claim and the following essay will be used to prove my point.
Firstly, the cost of preserving wilderness is much inferior compared to other human unnecessary activities. Many mundane and trivial projects are being funded due to incompetent governing worldwide. Hence, If people in high position know how to properly allocate the resources that they have and cut down the excess to prior wildlife maintaining, a nation’s biodiversity will be well-preserved and flourish. An example for this is the neglection Vietnamese government has for their environment since they could spend hundred thousand of dollar building meaningless welcome gates across the country while letting their environmental officers being underpaid.
Moreover, having diverse species and wild landscapes could bring about many positive impacts on people’ lives and countries. Safari tours and wilderness exploration services now booming. Tourists are willing to paid good money to be able to explore wildlife and sceneries. For instance, because of being untrodden by modernization, several villages in Africa generate high incomes by offering visitors opportunities to explore the wild. Therefore, creating jobs for the locals and increase global recognition for the place.
In conclusion, wildlife could be maintained in good condition with appropriate resource if people know how to appreciate and harmonize with it. Mother Nature will treat us well but we have to respect and adore her first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | ngo viet | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 10
- The Graph Below Shows Changes In The Share Of Vehicle Registrations Of The Three Most Common Types Of Commercial Vehicles In The US Between 1970 And 2010 Summarise The Information By Selecting And Reporting The Main Features And Make Comparisons
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...heir environment since they could spend hundred thousand of dollar building meaningless...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54724409449 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97723449326 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685039370079 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8797319055 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922764091307 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327587196767 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448500252609 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585020012127 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163421487114 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.