Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
Team work has always been a fundamental factor for achieving success. It is thought to provides individual's skills required for intellectual matters. I agree with the statement and will further expand the topic in this essay.
Firstly, working in team makes you an independent learner. Although it sounds counterintuitive, many project required repeated validation from each members to be able to work. For instance, google and big tech companies encourage their work to check on their own before agreeing on new ideas or innovations. If this action aren't be made, the team would follow the wrong direction causes by misinformed datas.
Secondly, a person who work in group can always pick up valuable skills from his peers. Due to high demand of international cooperation, workers nowadays may encounter colleagues from many countries. Not only this is a opportunity to take an insight from learner coming from different cultures, he or she could deepen the bag of skills with knowledge outside their own expertise. Moreover, a environment with great people can be vital to one's intellectual growth.
In conclusion, performing activities together can surely increase individual's mental capacity. It is a great way to learn from others as well as from oneself to select and validate advise and information that they are given.
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 83
- Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view 11
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In the modern world many employees lack soft skills such as communication and working in teams What are the main causes of this problem What are the effects of lack of such skills 84
- write an essay about environment in 300 words 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
...for achieving success. It is thought to provides individuals skills required for intelle...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required repeated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'repeating' or 'to be repeated'.
Suggestion: repeating; to be repeated
...counterintuitive, many project required repeated validation from each members to be able...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ew ideas or innovations. If this action arent be made, the team would follow the wron...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s from many countries. Not only this is a opportunity to take an insight from lea...
^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... outside their own expertise. Moreover, a environment with great people can be vi...
^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conclusion, performing activities together can surely increase individuals...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27358490566 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95664049778 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.707547169811 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2347477572 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766143673651 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287485941979 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293806629403 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441784664716 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220250944422 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.