The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years.
Given are the tables depicting the global pupils from a variety of nations who attended in Canada and the USA schools in two school year: 2002-2003 and 2003-2004.
Perceptibly, in two surveyed periods, there was a similarity in the number of students from three given nations that registered studying in two aforementioned countries. Additionally, while there was a significant leap in China and India’s volumes, The USA’s witnessed a steady extent.
Regarding the 2002s, in 59870 students engaged in each school, the quantity of Indian students was the lowest, with only 2100 students recorded. In the interim, There was a parallel in the others’ figure, with 5400 and 2100 in sequence, which are twice as higher as India’s value.
In terms of the latter year, there was a twofold escalation in the number of Chinese enrollers to 7850, followed by a sharp increase to 2835 of the India’s quantity of oversea students. Simultaneously, the ensuing 1 years brought a gradual expansion, with 9% ratcheted up, in the USA’s figure. Due to those mentioned transitions, the total of students in each school surged to 70004 at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Mayuresh Patoliya | 64 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Mayuresh Patoliya | 56 | view |
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the tables depicting the global pupils ...
^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a parallel in the others’ figure, with 5400 and 2100 in sequence, which are twi...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... in sequence, which are twice as higher as India’s value. In terms of the latter ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89315267657 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3533679062 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290388005543 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110441401244 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938971379375 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172641844059 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798422096961 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the tables depicting the global pupils ...
^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a parallel in the others’ figure, with 5400 and 2100 in sequence, which are twi...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... in sequence, which are twice as higher as India’s value. In terms of the latter ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89315267657 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3533679062 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290388005543 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110441401244 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938971379375 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172641844059 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798422096961 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.