It is argued that increasing the price of fuel is the most effective measure to address the problems of the environment. While this approach can potentially reduce harmful fume rates by limiting the number of vehicles on the roads, I maintain that running a global awareness campaign would be a more feasible way to address the root causes of this issue.
On the one hand, raising fuel costs might decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in cities at a certain level. In reality, vehicles release vast amounts of noxious fumes into the atmosphere every second, which makes the air more noxious and more polluted. Requiring individuals to pay more for their journeys can encourage them to rely less on their private vehicles. Singapore, for instance, successfully reduced the number of private car registrations by 15% when the government implemented a 20% increase in fuel prices in 2018. As a result, commuters might have to turn to other more cost-effective and greener means of transportation, such as buses, trains, or even electric bikes, which limit the amount of harmful fumes in the air.
However, this measure does not fully address the underlying causes of environmental problems. Moreover, environment-based issues can stem from various factors, including the use of plastic bags while shopping or the use of noxious chemicals in the agricultural and industrial sectors that contaminate both land and water. Therefore, the most effective approach would be launching a worldwide program to raise consumers' awareness of the importance of environmental costs. Moreover, the program encourages institutions to use fewer chemicals and adopt greener methods of farming and manufacturing. Sweden has been implementing sustainable farming practices, such as reduced pesticide usage and organic farming, to promote biodiversity and reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. In manufacturing, the country has been investing in renewable energy and promoting circular economy principles, such as designing products for reuse and recycling.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel prices can cut emissions to some extent by discouraging individuals from using private vehicles, a global awareness campaign will be a more effective measure to mitigate the underlying causes of this problem. I am also convinced that once this approach is implemented, there will be more people perceiving the importance of environmental protection, contributing to reducing environmental issues.
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 73
- Task 1 The table below gives information about values of the exports of Kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17544521461 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0665722379 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120284075994 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444993275043 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517338266583 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821981652736 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342950918056 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17544521461 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0665722379 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120284075994 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444993275043 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517338266583 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821981652736 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342950918056 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.