Given the circular charts illustrating the usage of water in percentage in six different regions worldwide. In general, it is clearly apparent that four of the six areas mostly used water for agricultural purpose while the remains two regions used water the most for industry.
As can be seen from the charts, in Africa, south America and two areas in Asia continent both in Central and Southeast Asia, more than 2/3 of water consumed in agricultural field (84%, 88%, 81%, and 71% respectively). On the other hand, in north America and Europe, the use of water for agricultural sector reported less than half of the total (only 39% and 32% respectively).
The areas of North America and Europe dominantly used water for industry which about approximately half of the total consumption (48% in North America and 53% in Europe). However, industrial water consumption in the other four regions significantly lower at 5% to 12%.
The domestic use of the water was the least consumption over the six regions which only less than 10% in Africa and Asia and 13% to 19% in America and Europe.
- Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays more people would rather purchase food than cook at home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 61
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88108108108 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70709912692 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9931047077 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21372558943 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111460482189 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678825475552 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137242179393 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085675273773 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.