You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given chart depicts how the population has change in two different countries : India and china since 2000 with the prediction to 2050.
What stands out from the chart is that the number of Indian is going to witness a steady progress and it maybe overtake that of China. On the other hand, China’s population is expected to fall in the future of 20 years.
In 2000, people lived in China much more than in India. There were about 1.2 billion of Chinese, while India’s population was accurately 1.0 billion. Over the period of 20 years from 2000, a growth of 0.3 billion was saw in the population of India. The number of Chinese citizens increased by 0.2 billion to reach over 1.4 billion during the same period.
According to the graph, the number of people living in India will have a quicker climb than that of China, and expectations reveal that both this tow nations will gain the same population of 1.45 billion by 2030. After peaking its highest point, China’s population tend to fall slightly back to 1.4 billion , whereas the number of Indian citizens is likely keep on rising and reach 1.6 in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overtakes'?
Suggestion: overtakes
... witness a steady progress and it maybe overtake that of China. On the other hand, China...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all in the future of 20 years. In 2000, people lived in China much more than in ...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
... from 2000, a growth of 0.3 billion was saw in the population of India. The number ...
^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...end to fall slightly back to 1.4 billion , whereas the number of Indian citizens i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70854271357 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3205315579 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0126012266 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236049729237 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110421596396 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689629038179 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15056122738 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425658183582 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.