The chart below shows information about subway systems in three major European cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and making comparisons

Given the table illustrating the information about the measure of three European subway systems by its total track length, its figures of operated stations, and its number of daily passengers. In general, the three subway systems compared have its superiority in different parameter.

To begin, based on their length of track both their underground and on the surface track, London Underground is the longest among other subway systems that has 408 km length. The Moscow Metro only length around three-quarter of London Underground while Paris Metro is slightly above a half of it at 214 km. On the other hand, regarding the number of stations in operation, Paris Metro is the system that has the highest stations at 300. Comparing to Paris Metro, London Underground has slightly lowed operated stations at 275 and Moscow Metro has the lowest at 182 stations.

Although Moscow Metro has the least operated stations, its daily passengers are the highest among other systems. The number of passengers using Moscow Metro is reported at 6.5 million of people. Comparing to Moscow Metro, Paris Metro users consisted only 4.5 million and the passengers of London Underground is not more than half of it at 3 million of people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10447761194 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62986975822 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1729413395 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947662269989 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469368179547 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596011172864 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082330267734 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841523612541 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10447761194 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62986975822 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1729413395 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947662269989 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469368179547 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596011172864 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082330267734 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841523612541 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.