Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, technology has increased dramatically in recent years, so some individuals have prone to use technology as a means of relaxation rather than engaging in outdoor activities in their leisure time. During this essay, I would elaborate the negative and positive impacts of phenomenon before drawing a rational conclusion.
Obviously, using technology in the free time is an advantage because it not only helps to reduce the contribution significantly to the percentage of increasing depression, but also it can simultaneously address some issues that are contained in the environment. With the enhancement of technology, there are more systems and devices which are innovated such as smartphones, computers, games, transportations and social networks. In addition, through social apps, people can easily update news fastly and improve their knowledge, skills without needing to be walking as far as. As a result, the exhaustion emitted to the environment will sharply decrease and people can save a huge amount of money instead of spending on other activities like going to the market, cinema.
Nevertheless, spending more time on these activities through technology may have an impact on the physical and mental. Social apps like Facebook, Instagrams, Twitter are appearing as a consequence of the development of technology but this can be detrimental to the young person. The number of time spent on these apps are blooming now so people may be controlled by them and then barely stop using these apps. Furthermore, staring at the screen for hours can cause eye irritation, energy drain, memory impairment and focus ability. Last but not least, since people are unable to spend much time with their family, it will not be close to the long distance between their relationships.
Put in a nutshell, most adults are definitely in favor of using technology to entertain and enjoy adventure experiences. However, this should be under control, because using too much can bring some disadvantages which would surely outweigh the benefit if people are addicted to such virtual forms of recreation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...apps like Facebook, Instagrams, Twitter are appearing as a consequence of the development of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3746223565 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01428828471 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61329305136 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7849026482 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.846153846 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26486102787 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080904842764 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502058408063 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150066885873 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556266785829 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.