Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Modern technology has been pivotal in improving our lives. Because of technology, we have better healthcare, faster communication, improved education and the list goes on. Despite its benefits, some people believe that technology has harmed worldwide culture, replacing it with a single world culture. With globalization, it is inevitable that cultures around the world should change, but I do not believe we have reached a point where we can say that a single world culture exists.
As I have said, it is undeniable that technology has had some impact on culture around the world. For example, people use the English language in order to be able to communicate online. Having a language that is universally understood by most people aids in online conversations. In many South Asian countries, people, especially younger generations, have taken up English as their primary language as it eases communication. It has come to a point that even locals communicate in English or a mixture of English and their mother-tongue. This is how we are endangering our native languages.
That being said, I believe that technology has not fully damaged global cultures. Customs tend to evolve as times and general beliefs change. But most traditions such as national and religious holidays are still the same in many countries. The way they are celebrated have not changed much over the years.
I also believe that technology can help save culture in many ways, such as preserving art, history and languages. For example, many museums make use of technology to digitize documents that can be hard to read in their original format. I also read somewhere about a woman creating an app to enable people from her country to learn a language that has been nearly forgotten.
All in all, technology has changed the world we live in thus changing culture and cultural values. However, its impact has not been so great that we can say we live in a single culture world. The same technology that is harming cultures can help save it too. With so many people, especially from the younger generations, adamant on saving their culture, it is unlikely that we see a future where we would have a single global culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | Alina_irfan | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | Dharmik94 | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | mehrnazsadr | 95 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | sadra1988 | 74 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Which is more important for a leader the ability to win an argument about an issue or the ability to help others come to an argument about an issue Use specific reasons and examples 60
- many people believe that greed or the desire to have more wealth than other people have is a bad characteristic people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind However some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a perso 60
- Summarize the points in the lecture being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about solar energy described in the reading passage 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02452316076 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79866624011 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50408719346 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9896648168 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8095238095 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4761904762 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172338479933 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520427814942 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526188297353 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956187448523 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061422635125 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02452316076 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79866624011 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50408719346 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9896648168 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8095238095 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4761904762 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172338479933 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520427814942 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526188297353 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956187448523 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061422635125 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.