The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph illustrated the percentage of recreational activities used by the older in their square time in the US from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, as is observed, seniors in USA spent most of their free time watching TV or in the theatre. However, at the end of time, they had just increase slightly and even down. Also, surfing the Internet and hiking had pretty low starting points but until the end they all had bounced.
As can be seen, in 1980s, watching TV got the highest proportion, which made up 60%, after that it went up to 70% in 2000s. Until 2010s, it slipped back to more than three-fifths. Theater viewing also accounted for 50% in 1980 but it fell 20% in 1990s. By 2010s, it had risen again which took up under a half.
This is followed by surfing the Internet which activity accounted for less than 10% in 1980s and after 3 decades it shot up to 50%. Hiking and reading both had starting points of 20% and 30% respectively. Nevertheless, reading fluctuate widely and at the end double from the original level, which accounted for 60%, also hiking had a rapid increase, it skyrocketed to 80% and became the highest level of leisure activities for the older in America.
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030 61
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 73
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... they all had bounced. As can be seen, in 1980s, watching TV got the highest proportion...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...de up 60%, after that it went up to 70% in 2000s. Until 2010s, it slipped back to more t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...counted for 50% in 1980 but it fell 20% in 1990s. By 2010s, it had risen again which too...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ch activity accounted for less than 10% in 1980s and after 3 decades it shot up to 50%. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58878504673 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51438346379 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6825977394 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757632183866 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032539437686 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047536526476 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599678716369 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509101414067 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.