Ethanol as an alternative to petroleum
The reading puts forward certain reasons against the idea of adopting ethanol as an alternative to gasoline. But, on the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on these claims and finds them unconvincing.
Firstly, the author asserts that burning ethanol produces carbon dioxide gas similar to gasoline, so it wouldn't help in subsidizing the process of global warming. However, the lecturer says that the carbon dioxide gas produced will be utilized by a greater number of plants that will be grown for the purpose of producing ethanol.
The second argument of the author is that the production of ethanol will require a large quantity of corn, which will decrease its availability for farm animals. The lecturer challenges this argument by stating that ethanol can be produced from any part of a plant containing cellulose, and animals do not eat these parts.
Finally, the author mentions that ethanol cannot compete with gasoline in terms of price, because currently they both have the same price, but it is due to the subsidies provided by the government; otherwise, its price would have been much higher. The lecturer refutes this point and states that if gasoline will be replaced by ethanol, then production of ethanol will be increased, and consequently its price will be lowered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | Anurag96 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Christine hanna | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | shahabaddin_solaimanian | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | Christine hanna | 70 | view |
- Painting of young Jane Austen 78
- Which is better for children s education 9 month study and 3 month break or 3 month study and 1 month break 70
- Whether government should fubd public transports or improve the condition of roads 70
- Ecotourism as a possible solution for ameliorating the conditions of rainforest area and its people 70
- technology 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... dioxide gas similar to gasoline, so it wouldnt help in subsidizing the process of glob...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11374407583 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60009519966 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611374407583 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.875 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178481500213 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841349562023 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833370843264 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113133001254 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540770400793 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.