Nowadays we are producing more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In today’s era of industrialization, there is growing awareness of excessive trash that people are producing. This planet is about to be flooded by different type of garbage if certain measures are not taken. The causes behind this phenomenon are discussed and ways to solve this problem are also proposed.
First and foremost reason for of mounting garbage is increasing consumerism. Most of the companies use excessive packing to improve their sales. As it is considered that attractive packing like boxes, packets make things presentable and allure people to buy them. Furthermore, consumers of such products do not use trash cans to dispose them off appropriately, so there is no there is no recycling of these packing that leads to piling up of the litter. In addition, as there is more consumption there is more waste collection too. Government and business encourages the consumption in sake of higher profits and development of state and economy. But, buying new things means discarding the old ones, eventually it results in rubbish production.
However, this problem should be solved with war footing efforts and for this combined efforts of government and the public are needed that can reduce this prevailing problem by a considerable proportion. Firstly, certain laws regarding percentage of packing must be established and packing material used should be bio degradable. Apart from this, customers must be provided discounts and offers for not asking plastic bags in super markets. As it will encourage people to avoid products with massive packing and thus, companies will also change their strategy to have alluring packing to raise sales. Consequently, garbage from packing can be reduced with great success.
To sum up, everyone should become concerned about future of human beings and our planet. Otherwise, earth will be buried in rubbish. People must think twice before buying things they do not need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | Asifsunny | 61 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 73
- Modern buildings change the character and appearance of towns and cities The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 84
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o solve this problem are also proposed. First and foremost reason for of mountin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, apart from, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28664495114 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81870964915 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3555794376 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13770708995 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413347848558 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398492622624 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824010242891 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190517398063 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.