The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
The map illustrates some changes to Grange Park in 1920 and the same place today.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the park witnessed some considerable changes during the period shown. There were noticeable different between the two maps, mostly regarding to the development of entertainment facilities and how the garden has been expanded.
The most striking change is in the centre of the park where the fountain has been destroyed to make way for a new larger rose garden with four seats at each side. Meanwhile, the stage for musicians has been demolished and replaced by a modern amphitheatre, followed by the knockdown of two gardens opposite it. On the right side of the present map, a new water feature has been replaced by the glasshouse, which is laid next to an underground entrance leading to the car park.
Turning to the other features, the entrance on Eldon street and the second on Arnold avenue have remained unchanged, but the garden on the top of the map has become to a café. Finally, the pond for water plants in 1920 has now been changed to a children’s playground.
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84974093264 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73710517606 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611398963731 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4015335285 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131916174346 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656458204891 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847795125963 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10600013633 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988579010913 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.