The given map demonstrates the alternations made in one territory from 1995 till now. Overall, what stands out from the map is that during that time, the areal witnessed dramatic changes with the addition of some buildings.
A more detailed look at the maps reveals that the most striking changes can be in the recreational facilities. The farmland has been turned into golf which is situated to the north of tennis that has been erected by removing forest park. Along a road which is next to sea both part of it has been changed, restaurant and apartments have been built instead of shop and fish market. So another noticeable change has been done, fishing port has been demolished. In addition, car park has been developed to the right of hotel for being comfortable to people stayed there. More importantly, housing has been expanded, also the way which is close to them, has been extended. The only thing remained untouched has been the east part of the island with cafe
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 40
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77514792899 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51213921944 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656804733728 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7487620067 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604018528774 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283650632812 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369658107816 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629652889356 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374817765296 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.