The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features, and make comparisons where necessary.
The diagram illustrates 5 steps to how pure water is produced from rain drops in an Australian inhabitant.
Overall, the process is a predominantly manual process where rainwater is collected and filtered into usable water. This liquid is then pumped up into households for different uses.
The first stage is when it rains, the water follows down the roof and is instantly led to the drain which is connected to a complex system underneath the surface. The next step is where water goes through a water filter so as to be processed before being stored in a storage. Having been stored, it continues going through a pipe leading to another container. By this stage, the amount is reduced so that the next step can be assured. Subsequently, it is being treated by chemicals in order to sterilise drinking water from any unwanted elements. Finally, it moves up to serve the residents.
- The graph below shows an average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers 67
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparisons where necessary
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide Co2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...where water goes through a water filter so as to be processed before being stored in a s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90066225166 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71963784007 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6749800457 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153429576093 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561126716853 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577048656268 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11826545873 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427772797531 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.