The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in four European countries, namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, over a forty-year period from 1967 to 2007.

Overall, it can be observed that Sweden and the United Kingdom experienced a decline in their CO2 emissions, while Italy and Portugal witnessed an increase. Moreover, Sweden had the highest CO2 emissions in the beginning, but it decreased significantly, and by the end of the period, it had the lowest CO2 emissions among all the countries.

Regarding the countries that experienced an increase in their CO2 emissions, Italy's emissions doubled from four metric tonnes to eight metric tonnes, while Portugal's emissions tripled from 1.5 metric tonnes to 4.5 metric tonnes.

On the other hand, the United Kingdom and Sweden's CO2 emissions decreased over the given period. Sweden, which had the highest CO2 emissions in the beginning, showed a significant decline from over 10 metric tonnes in 1977 to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Similarly, the United Kingdom's CO2 emissions fell by two metric tonnes from eleven metric tonnes to nine metric tonnes.

In conclusion, the line graph clearly depicts the trend in CO2 emissions in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. While Italy and Portugal experienced an increase in their CO2 emissions, Sweden and the United Kingdom witnessed a decline.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-06 tr_h.20 73 view
2023-10-06 tr_h.20 73 view
2023-10-05 tr_h.20 67 view
2023-10-05 tr_h.20 67 view
2023-10-05 tr_h.20 67 view
Essays by user hanbnguyenle :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30263157895 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65293599734 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438596491228 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2376431174 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294907467268 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164518544107 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780775323136 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205456457445 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898825720177 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.