Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In some cities, people are encouraged to use public transportation instead of private ones on vehicle-free days. In my opinion, this policy brings more advantages than disadvantages.
Regarding environmental effects, It is true that the amount of toxic gas released from vehicles, such as private cars, trucks, and motorcycles annually can damage severely the atmosphere, therefore leading to numerous health problems. By designing vehicle-free days and promoting public vehicles, the government could reduce the number of harmful emissions and alleviate the consequences on the environment. Although It takes effort to ensure that everyone could access public transportation, The cumulative effects of this scheme on the environment are huge, hence it is worth enacting vehicle-free days on large scale.
Another main advantage of having vehicle-free days and banning certain means of transport is to reduce traffic jams. Too many vehicles commuting on a title unit can cause traffic jams, which often lead to drivers’ frustration, accidents, and interrupting some special vehicles doing their work, such as ambulances or fire trucks. In addition, people might suffer from several respiratory diseases by absorbing polluted gas for a long time. To cope with this serious issue, some cities have banned private vehicles and encouraged their citizens to use public transportation, and it was proven to bring huge benefits. It can be seen that countries having developed bus or metro systems show fewer traffic jams than those in developing and undeveloped countries.
In conclusion, enacting a vehicle-free day is an effective method to protect the environment. Although this requires people to change their daily travel habits by giving up private vehicles and using public transportation instead, I believe that the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages, thus government should implement it as a key solution to reduce the severe damage resulting from vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | minh phương phạm hồng | 89 | view |
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 67
- The table below gives information about salaries of secondary high school teachers in five countries in 2009 56
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many companies today sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that this is a good thing for the world of sports Others think this has disadvantages Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...ing developed bus or metro systems show fewer traffic jams than those in developing and undev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and using public transportation instead, I believe that the advantages of this po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66555183946 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0922260144 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2139200522 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445249186801 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156545495519 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929013556664 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271535449412 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416702491611 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.