Many companies today sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves. Some people think that this is a good thing for the world of sports. Others think this has disadvantages. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
For many companies, sponsoring sports is a strategy to advertise themselves, and was considered to bring advantages in sports. However, some people are against this promotion due to its drawbacks. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and offer my own perspectives.
On the one hand, sponsoring can help athletes to concentrate more on practicing as they don’t have to worry about financial issues. In addition, it allowed them to access exclusive facilities, for example, fields that meet international standards, which encourage them to improve their inherent talent. Therefore, this can be an effective way to increase training quality and on the whole, contribute to the development of the world of sport
On the other hand, promoting products and services in this way can bring in certain disadvantages. Firstly, the audience might have to face unwanted interruptions, such as advertisements on TV, as a result, reducing their interest while watching the match. Secondly, companies frequently request the board organization to have their brand name printed on athletes’ kits or advertise their products through the led screen. This can reduce the true meaning of sport and accidentally commercialize the game since companies have considered spectators as potential clients in the future.
Although having some drawbacks, I believe the advantages of this advertising strategy outweigh the disadvantages. This is because financial support from companies can help hold sports events more efficiently, particularly specialized competitions, hence promoting sport development and raising their influence among people. Furthermore, the disadvantages of funding sport organization might not severely impact much on the development of sport in general and could be accepted.
In conclusion, sponsoring sports can have both positive and negative sides. However, its advantages outweigh the disadvantages, therefore, should be sustained.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | minh phương phạm hồng | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | minh phương phạm hồng | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s outweigh the disadvantages, therefore, should be sustained.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76551724138 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22972225221 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5176172506 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272512310366 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932717734577 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579046726303 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155119029574 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632619680034 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.