The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table depicts data regarding the budget of Britain police while the two pie charts illustrate the way it was allocated between 2017 and 2018.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there was an upward trends in all examined sources in which Local Taxes maintained the largest financial support. Also noticeable is that the amount of money spent for officers and staff's salaries was the majority of distribution which outnumbered Technology and Buildings and transports sectors.
Initially observing at the sources of Police budget, National Government registered the highest contribution to the police's budget which slightly rose by 2.3 million pounds, from 175.5 to 177.8 million pounds in the given period. Thus was followed by the amount of Local Taxes which was a significant upsurge by over 11 million pounds to reach 102.3 million pounds in 2018 while Other Sources (such as grants) accounted for only a fraction of sources at around 38 million pounds in two years.
Regarding the apportionment of budget, the salary goes for officers and staffs witnessed a dramatically decrease from 75% to 69%, followed by Buildings and transport which remained the same at 17% over the period. Additionally, the figure for Technology was occupied nearly a twofold increase from 8% to 14% but still the lowest budget allocation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Gracegracegraxe | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was allocated between 2017 and 2018. Looking from an overall perspective, it ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...intained the largest financial support. Also noticeable is that the amount of money ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al Taxes which was a significant upsurge by over 11 million pounds to reach 102.3...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... goes for officers and staffs witnessed a dramatically decrease from 75% to 69%, followed by Buildings ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, regarding, so, still, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26267281106 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74883150941 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3517823638 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.142857143 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177629990904 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910796243165 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648171207225 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123296172559 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690303699055 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.