The protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world.
The bar charts illustrate the details of the calorie and protein intake of four different countries in the world including India, Africa, Latin America, and North America. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, it can be clear that North America stands at the highest levels of calorie and animal protein intake compared to the other three countries. While Indians consume a minimal amount of animal protein in contrast to peak levels of plant protein and calorie intake.
In terms of both animal and plant protein consumption, North Americans have the greater amount with 70% animal protein and 30 percent plant protein accordingly. Conversely, Indians have 90 percent of plant protein and a mere 10 percent of animal protein. Latin Americans and Africans consume 55% and 75% animal protein and 40% and 20 % plant protein respectively.
Regarding calorie intake, North Americans have 2500 grams of calorie intake which is 1500 grams higher than Latin America with 2000 grams. Furthermore, Africa accounts for the least calorie consumption with 1600 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 89
- the bar chart below show the percentage of the population aged 65 and over in three countreis in 1980 2000 and prediction for 2030 73
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they be punished? 84
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below provides information on the methods of waste disposal in four European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, furthermore, if, regarding, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33928571429 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48609451612 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.414474585 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2947717999 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127005559278 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732560814249 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187899695812 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525866651715 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.