The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world. Compare and contrast.
The given bar charts illustrate how much protein and calories people in different parts of the world consume.
Overall, what stands out from the first chart is that first on the list is the protein consumption of North American people.
As can be seen from the first chart, people in North America have the highest proportion of four-fifths, including the maximum percentage of protein (62%) derived from other sources and fats and meats (18%). Coming in a distant second is the protein intake of Latin American people with approximately 45%. It is followed by the figure for East African people and the Indians, with more or less 30%, and the percentage of animal protein and other protein make up nearly equal proportions.
Moving on to the second bar chart, it is notable that the number of calories taken in by North Americans came top, at 3500. Next came people from Latin America and East Africa, with respective figures of just under 3000 and nearly 2500. In the last place is the figure for Indian people, as they only consumed 2000 calories
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
- Many different countries have most shops and products the same Some consider it a positive development whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- many young people nowadays change their jobs or career every few years What are the causes Do its advantages outweight its disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36547979129 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4087799207 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268611102223 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122928081143 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106968789833 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184112865195 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125275518473 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.