Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
In this modern world, numerous life-changing inventions, such as the internet, have enormously facilitated education. Therefore, there exists a growing belief that before long in 2050, the recent classroom system is likely to disappear. I completely approve of this statement because of two main reasons.
First and foremost, the likelihood is that the dominance of technology nowadays will eliminate the recent type of school. High-tech, undoubtedly, has paved the way for far better and convenient education. Take, for example, distance learning which allowed the educational system to run smoothly and stay stable during the Covid 19 pandemic. Amidst the situation of such devastating and catastrophic epidemic, online learning enabled students to learn effectively while studying at home, and teachers could deliver their lectures better thanks to wide-ranging study applications such as Google Meet, Zoom, Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams, to name but a few. Hence, in lieu of studying in a conventional environment at school, students and teachers are expected to totally connect together and accumulate knowledge with the help of technology.
The disappearance of traditional classrooms is also anticipated to stem from the convenience and benefits of studying at home. There is no denying the fact that if students will not have to go to school on a daily basis, there will surely be less use of vehicles, which, on a whole, may lessen the exhaust fumes emission and undesirable accidents. Without a doubt, this, in turn, will do wonders for the environment and the safety of students.
On the other hand, opponents of my idea may argue that it is highly likely that for the sake of students and teachers, the conventional system of classes cannot disappear as new types of classrooms, namely online ones, may wreak havoc on the relationships of peers or even essential skills of students such as teamwork. However, they should bear in mind that there is a variety of applications which facilitate rapid communication within a few seconds regardless of geographical distance. Additionally, apps such as Zoom have a dedicated feature for collaboration among students, ensuring the improvement of necessary skills.
In conclusion, I hold the firm belief that the current system of classes will be definitely replaced by online classes. Not only is the new one moderner, but it is also conducive to the study of students. Hence, in the hope of develop the educational system, schools should get rid of the traditional classrooms and simultaneously, promote the advantages of online learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Tạ Phương Trà | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | An Hai Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Quyenhaidang | 68 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Jenny213987 | 79 | view |
- The increasingly wide use of computers in education has decreased the importance of teachers roles in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In today s age of technological advancement many consumers are having increasing preferences for hand craft products instead of mass manufactured goods Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive trend 89
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 89
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37804878049 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07595789214 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9293194019 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.705882353 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167811910433 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488413722993 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402260998584 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09291881247 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032747701648 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.