Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the desertification of forest area. The author of the reading states that owing to the usuage of products manufactured by wood it has affected our ambience as well as habitat to great extent. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating instance of Amazon forest which is the principle agent for absorbing world’s carbon dioxide. Similarly, wood industries are chopping the trees in huge amount which consequently lead to the soaring earth’s temperature. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends although they cut trees they is a policy of planting trees after chopping it. In addition, they are not allowed to cut trees utterly.
Secondly, deforestation has created challenges to wildlife species. Furthermore, with the increment in saw mill there is plummeting in wild animals such as wolves, beer and so on and eventually they are in the verge of extinction. The speaker on other hand points out that woods are deacying naturally on one hand and on other trees are cutting in order to create livestock which means developing habitat for wild species. Hence, deforestation is not the reason for their decrement but the consumption of meat is in real.
Finally, eventhough it is suggested to use paper bag instead of plastic one, it is perceived that both are equally devastating. Moreover, plastic can not be exterminate so it is detrimental to surrounding whereas in order to make paper bag trees must be destroyed. Thus, both are equally responsible for environmental degradation. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that products are being produced by limiting the devastation to environment. Likewise, plantation is done in a bare land after it is chopped down.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on deforestation. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from our personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 70
- Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nce as well as habitat to great extent. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea...
^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
... instance of Amazon forest which is the principle agent for absorbing world’s carbon diox...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...e contends although they cut trees they is a policy of planting trees after choppi...
^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'surround'?
Suggestion: surround
... be exterminate so it is detrimental to surrounding whereas in order to make paper bag tree...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, well, whereas, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1975308642 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98814530197 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7420677289 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1904761905 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11487243407 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295566715096 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328907328342 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575036258774 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370016300443 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.